1. In my opinion, Cole finds it "magically seductive"that it could have been so easy for us to be born as either a tiny bug, or a large animal. He finds that all different living organisms on the planet view the world in a different way and he would want to live a life in all those different ways. Though I do believe that all things view the world differently, I don't think I'd want to live through all of them. Being a tiny bug could potentially be quite frightening.
In the text, Cole stated that the ability to change size seems to have a "powerful pull on our psyches." Thinking back on it now I realize that I always have been extremely interested in things that have shown size change. The way that everything seemed to them, either unusually small or big, was so fascinating to me.
The fact that now I know that when a fly gets stuck in my soup will change the way I feel about it... to an extent. Now when it happens I will know what strenuous activity the fly will be going through and continue to grow through until the day it dies. However at the same time, I will still think its gross that a fly has landed in my food and I will still not be able to eat it. This is because I have always felt this way about dirty flies landing in my food and I dont think it is weird nor cruel of me to think that way.
2. It is not quite clear to me as to why Cole ended her essay with a quote from another author. In my opinion, though sources are a good way to support what your trying to say and to relate to your audience, to have the quote at the end of the piece just gives the impression that Cole is not confident in her writing and she needs the strong ending from another author. Ending clinchers are extremely important, and for it not to be in your own words is a bad move in my eyes and writing style. Because of this, footnoting the quote or paraphrasing would have been a better option. Other than the ending, Cole weaves quotes from other authors quite effectively throughout the rest of her essay.